image

Air Quality - Recognition and Perception of Problems by Individuals

Download Paper PDF: Download pdf
Author(s):
Abstract:

The article presents the results of a study on subjective opinions of Europeans in two generations Y and BB. Due to the lack of data, the assessments made by residents of only 23 EU member countries were analyzed. These assessments concerned air quality, actions taken by decision-makers to improve air quality, and knowledge and awareness of the threats related to air pollution. The data came from the Eurobarometer surveys conducted in 2012 and 2019. A correspondence analysis of concatenated tables with supplementary points and aggregate measures of development were used to find relationships between generations from different countries and to indicate changes in the perception of air pollution. The aim of the study has been achieved. The areas where differences and similarities between generations occur, and where opinions expressed by a generation change over time have been identified. The Problems that require solving have been indicated so that individual actions leading to the improvement of air quality could be assessed.


© 2021 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which permits any further distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


How to cite:

Stanimir, A. (2021). Air Quality – Recognition and Perception of Problems by Individuals. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XVI, Winter, 4(74), 389-393. https://doi.org/10.57017/jaes.v16.4(74).01

References:

[1]    Backhaus, Klaus, Bernd Erichson, Wulff Plinke, and Rolf Weiber. 2003. Multivariate Analyse methoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Zehnte Auflage. Berlin: Springer.

[2]    Blasius, Jörg. 2001. Korrespondenz Analyse. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

[3]    Bochenek, Dariusz, Urszula Dawgiałło, Emilia Gorzkowska, Jarosław Hejne, Katarzyna Karpińska, Agata Kiełczykowska, Dorota Kruszewska, Teresa Pawłowska, Joanna Sulik, Aleksandra Wichniewicz, and Anna Wrzosek. 2020. Ochrona środowiska. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/environment-energy/environment/environment-2020,1,12.html 

[4]    Cori, Liliana, Gabriele Donzelli, Francesca Gorini, Fabrizio Bianchi, and Olivia Curzio. 2020. Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17): 6424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176424 

[5]    Chiarini, Bruno, Antonella D'Agostino, Elisabetta Marzano, and Andrea Regoli. 2021. Air quality in urban areas: Comparing objective and subjective indicators in European countries. Ecological Indicators, Volume 121: 107144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107144 

[6]    Greenacre, Michael. 2010. Biplots in practice. Bilbao: Fundacion BBVA.

[7]    Greenacre, Michael. 1984. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press.

[8]    Hansen, James, Makiko Sato, and Reto Ruedy. 2012. Perception of climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(37), E2415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205276109.

[9]    Lammel, Annamaria. 2015. Climate change: From perception to action. La Fondation de l’Ecologie Politique – FEP Working Papers, 5, 1-12.

[10]  Lebart, Ludovic, Alain Morineau, Kenneth M. Warwick. 1984. Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis. Correspondence Analysis and Related Techniques for Large Matrices. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[11]  Mukhtarova, Karlygash, Yermek Chukubayev, Magbat Spanov, and Zhazira Kusmoldayeva. 2018. Econometric assessment of sustainable development and status of health among the population. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XIII, Fall, 6(60): 1802-1812. 

[12]  Olabe, Antxon. 2015. Climate change. The challenge that will define our generation. [Presentation at the University of Green Bay, Wisconsin], Wisconsin, United States. Accessed November 10, 2021. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/15173672/Climate_Change_A_Defining_Issue_of_Our_Generation.

[13]  Renn, Ortwin. 2011. The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 2: 154-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.99 

[14]  Qin, Hua, Patricia Romero-Lankao, Jorgelina Hardoy, Angélica Rosas-Huerta. 2015. Household responses to climate-related hazards in four Latin American cities: A conceptual framework and exploratory analysis. Urban Climate, Volume 14, Part 1: 94-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.05.003.

[15]  Śmiech, Sławomir. 2004. Wyznaczanie syntetycznej miary poziomu życia ludności. In Poziom życia w Polsce i krajach Unii Europejskiej edited by Aleksander Zeliaś. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.

[16]  Stanimir, Agnieszka. 2005. Analizy korespondencji jako narzędzie do badania zjawisk ekonomicznych. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu.

[17]  Stanimir, Agnieszka. 2020. Agricultural and Organic Farming Production in the Analysis of Social Well-Being in the European Union Countries. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XV, Summer, 2(68): 377-388.

[18]  Sundblad, Eva-Lotta, Anders Biel, and Tommy Gärling. 2014. Intention to change activities that reduce carbon dioxide emissions related to worry about global climate change consequences. European Review of Applied Psychology, Volume 64, Issue 1: 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2011.12.001.

[19]  Ustawa z dnia 27 kwietnia 2001 r. Prawo ochrony środowiska (The Act of April 27, 2001, Environmental Protection Law) (Dz. U. 2001 Nr 62/627).

*** Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21st of May, 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/50/oj 

*** European Commission [EC]. 2013. Flash Eurobarometer 360 (Attitudes of Europeans Towards Air Quality). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5795 Data File Version 1.0.1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11580 

*** European Commission, Brussels [EC]. 2021. Eurobarometer 92.1 (2019). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7579 Data file Version 3.0.0. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13716 

*** European Environmental Agency [EEA]. 2013. Air quality in Europe – 2013 Report. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2013 

*** European Environmental Agency [EEA]. 2020. Air quality in Europe – 2020 report. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2020-report 

*** European Environmental Agency [EEA]. 2021. Health impacts of air pollution in Europe, 2021 Briefing. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/health-risks-of-air-pollution 

*** Green Growth Best Practice (GGBP). 2014. Green Growth in Practice: Lessons from Country Experiences. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/research/green-growth-practice-lessons-country-experiences 

*** United Nations Economic Commission for Europe [UNECE]. 2011. Mapping critical levels for vegetation. In Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads and levels. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: https://icpvegetation.ceh.ac.uk/get-involved/manuals/mapping-manual 

*** United Nations Environment [UN]. 2019. Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People. Nairobi. DOI:10.1017/9781108627146

*** United Nations Environment Programme [UN]. 2021. Adapt to Survive: Business transformation in a time of uncertainty. UNEP, Nairobi. DOI:10.1017/9781108627146

*** United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development [UN]. 1987. Our Common Future. U.N. Doc A/42/427, Annex. Accessed November 20, 2021. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf 

*** United States Environmental Protection Agency [US EPA]. 2020. Particulate Matter (PM) Basics. Accessed May 13, 2021. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics#PM 

*** World Health Organization [WHO]. 2000. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. Second Edition. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 91.

*** World Health Organization [WHO]. 2006. Air quality guidelines: Global update 2005 – Particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. Accessed November 23, 2021. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/air-quality/publications/pre2009/air-quality-guidelines.-globalupdate-2005.-particulate-matter,-ozone,-nitrogendioxide-and-sulfur-dioxide 

[20]  World Health Organization [WHO]. ‎2021‎. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (‎PM2.5 and PM10)‎, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization. Accessed November 19, 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345329.Chaplin, G. 2005. Credit Derivatives. Wiley and Son Publishing.