image

Does Co-location Scam Really Exist? A Review of National Stock Exchange Co-location Scam

Download Paper PDF: Download pdf
Author(s):
  • Harsh Raj PATHAK Department of Finance and Accounting, ICFAI Business School ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education, Hyderabad, India
Abstract:

The present paper provides the comprehensive review of co-location facility and related technical glitch or scam at National Stock Exchange (NSE). The previous technological advancements such as algorithmic trading (AT) and high-frequency trading (HFT) contributes the market positively by controlling volatility and as liquidity provider. Particularly, Algorithmic trading has been praised for providing liquidity and controlling volatility, particularly for retail traders. However, some argue that it harms both small and institutional traders and the market's order. This article analyses the influence of co-location on the major characteristics affecting market quality: Price discovery, liquidity, transaction costs, volatility, and punishing slower traders. The findings of the paper suggest that co-location is not a scam it is a glitch of servers which has given loopholes to the institutional traders and ultra-speed of information flow.


Copyright© 2025 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which permits any further distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


How to cite:

Pathak, H. R. (2025). Does Co-location Scam Really Exist? A Review of National Stock Exchange Co-location Scam. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XX, Spring, 1(87),  51 – 58. https://doi.org/10.57017/jaes.v20.1(87).04 


References:

Aggarwal, N., & Thomas, S. (2014). The causal impact of algorithmic trading on market quality. http://hdl.handle.net/2275/323


Agnihotri, S., & Nagpal, A. (2019). The Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Market Quality: Testimony from Indian Equity Derivatives Market. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 25(3).


Bershova, N., & Rakhlin, D. (2013). The non-linear market impact of large trades: Evidence from buy-side order flow. Quantitative Finance, 13(11), 1759-1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2013.861076


Boehmer, E., Fong, K., & Wu, J. J. (2021). Algorithmic trading and market quality: International evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(8), 2659-2688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109020000782


Budish, E., Cramton, P., & Shim, J. (2014). Implementation details for frequent batch auctions: Slowing down markets to the blink of an eye. American Economic Review, 104(5), 418-424. 10.1257/aer.104.5.418


Chaboud, A. P., Chiquoine, B., Hjalmarsson, E., & Vega, C. (2014). Rise of the machines: Algorithmic trading in the foreign exchange market. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2045-2084. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12186


Conrad, J., Wahal, S., & Xiang, J. (2015). High-frequency quoting, trading, and the efficiency of prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(2), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.02.008


Frino, A., Garcia, M., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Impact of algorithmic trading on speed of adjustment to new information: Evidence from interest rate derivatives. Journal of Futures Markets, 40(5), 749-760. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22104


Frino, A., Mollica, V., Monaco, E., & Palumbo, R. (2017). The effect of algorithmic trading on market liquidity: Evidence around earnings announcements on Borsa Italiana. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 45, 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.07.003


Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2013). Algorithmic trading and the market for liquidity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(4), 1001-1024. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109013000471


Iyer, G., Jain, A., Gupta, A., Ahuja, B., & Shah, R. An Analysis of the Effects of Algorithmic Trading on National Stock Exchange. https://pramanaresearch.org/


Kelejian, H. H., & Mukerji, P. (2016). Does high frequency algorithmic trading matter for non-AT investors?. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.10.014


Kokane, S. (2024). NSE: Corporate Governance Transgression. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 09746862241286277. https://doi.org/10.1177/097468622412862


Kwan, A., Masulis, R., & McInish, T. H. (2015). Trading rules, competition for order flow and market fragmentation. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.010


Mestel, R., Murg, M., & Theissen, E. (2018). Algorithmic trading and liquidity: Long term evidence from Austria. Finance Research Letters, 26, 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.01.004


Seo, J. Y., & Chai, S. (2013). The role of algorithmic trading systems on stock market efficiency. Information Systems Frontiers, 15, 873-888. 10.1007/s10796-013-9442-9


Syamala, S. R., & Wadhwa, K. (2020). Trading performance and market efficiency: Evidence from algorithmic trading. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101283


Zhang, F. (2010). High-frequency trading, stock volatility, and price discovery. Available at SSRN 1691679. 


Jones, C. M. (2013). What do we know about high-frequency trading? Working paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1691679


Zhang, S., & Riordan, R. (2011). Technology and market quality: the case of high frequency trading. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2011/95


Kandukuri, R. (2024). An analysis of stockbroking frauds and regulatory action in India. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(4), 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2023-0076


Li, J., Zhou, Y., & Hu, J. (2024). Unpacking the effects of scams in marketplace lending: investor confidence and attention. Journal of Applied Economics, 27(1), 2301797. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2024.2301797