image

Lean–Industry 4.0 Synergy in the Moroccan Automotive Sector: A PLS-SEM Analysis of Organisational and Competitive Performance

Download Paper: Download pdf
Download supplementary file: Download
Author(s):
  • Nedra SALEM National School of Commerce and Management, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier, Morocco
  • Youssef AL MERIOUH National School of Commerce and Management, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier, Morocco
Abstract:

This study examines Lean Management–Industry 4.0 integration in the Moroccan automotive sector using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) and survey data from 263 managers and professionals involved in Lean and/or Industry 4.0 implementation. The results show that Lean–Industry 4.0 integration is not directly associated with significantly higher continuous process improvement and production flexibility. Organisational and cultural challenges are negatively associated with these outcomes, whereas training and change-management capabilities are positively associated with them. Continuous process improvement and production flexibility are, in turn, positively associated with competitive advantage. Complementary structural relationships further show that technological integration, implementation complexity, training, and organisational challenges coexist within the broader transformation process. These findings support a socio-technical interpretation in which organisational and human capabilities accompany technological integration and are associated with continuous-improvement outcomes.

From an applied economic perspective, the findings suggest that capability development and continuous improvement may contribute to more efficient use of labour and installed capital and, when diffused across firms and suppliers, may support productivity upgrading, regional value creation, and the attractiveness of Moroccan automotive industrial zones to foreign direct investment. These broader economic effects are interpreted as implications of the firm-level results rather than as directly estimated macroeconomic effects. Policy implications therefore emphasize combining Industry 4.0 investment incentives with workforce training, organisational-readiness measures, supplier development, and measurable productivity targets.


Copyright© 2026 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which permits any further distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Article’s History: Received 9th of July, 2026; Revised 24th of August, 2026; Accepted 12th of September; Available online: 30th of September, 2026. Published as an article in Volume XXI, Fall, Issue 4(94), 2026.


How to cite:

Salem, N., & Al Meriouh, Y. (2026). Lean–Industry 4.0 Synergy in the Moroccan Automotive Sector: A PLS-SEM Analysis of Organisational and Competitive Performance. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XXI, Fall, 4(94), 1267-1296. https://doi.org/10.57017/jaes.v21.4(94).09


CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement: Salem, N.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Al Meriouh, Y.: Supervision, Validation, Methodological guidance, Writing – review & editing.


Acknowledgments/Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


Data Availability Statement: The statistical outputs supporting the measurement-model, structural-model, bootstrapping, indirect-effect, and predictive-performance analyses are available in a supplementary workbook accompanying the online version of this article. The respondent-level dataset is not publicly deposited because public data sharing was not documented as part of the participant consent process. Anonymized data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to applicable confidentiality and ethical considerations.


Ethical Approval Statement: The study involved a voluntary questionnaire survey of professional respondents and did not collect sensitive personal or medical information. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all respondents. The authors report that, under the institutional requirements applicable to this study, formal ethical approval was not required.


References:

Bahulikar, S., Chattopadhyay, A., & Hudnurkar, M. (2023). Framework for integrating lean thinking with Industry 4.0: Way ahead for entrepreneurs in Indian MSME’s. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(2), 271–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557231184531


Buer, S. V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. S. (2018). The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: Mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924–2940.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1442945


Carboni, O. A., & Medda, G. (2024). Endogenous innovation and export performance in firms. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 19(1), 48–62.https://doi.org/10.57017/jaes.v19.1(83).03


Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110


Évrard, Y., Pras, B., Roux, E., Dussaix, A.-M., & Lilien, G. L. (2009). Market: Fondements et méthodes des recherches en marketing (4e éd.). Dunod, 720 p., 2009, ECO.GEST. MASTE. https://hec.hal.science/hal-00490724 


Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104


Frank, A. G., Sturgeon, T. J., Benitez, G. B., Marodin, G. A., & Ferreira e Cunha, S. (2025). How Lean and Industry 4.0 affect worker outcomes and operational performance: A quantitative assessment of competing models. International Journal of Production Economics, 279, 109475.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109475


Frank, A. G., Thürer, M., Godinho Filho, M., & Marodin, G. A. (2024). Beyond Industry 4.0 – Integrating Lean, digital technologies and people. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(6), 1109–1126.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2024-0069


Griguer, S., & Ait Lhassan, I. (2024). The determinants of foreign direct investment localization: An empirical analysis of the Moroccan automotive industry. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(11), e2024237. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024237


Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1544396422


Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203


Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Volume 20, pp. 277–319). Emerald JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014


Hossain, M. M., & Purdy, G. (2023). Integration of Industry 4.0 into Lean production systems: A systematic literature review. Manufacturing Letters, 35, 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.098


Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry: Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion & acatech. https://en.acatech.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/03/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf 


Komkowski, T., Sony, M., Antony, J., Lizarelli, F. L., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Tortorella, G. L. (2025). Operational practices for integrating lean and Industry 4.0 – A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 63(4), 1517–1537.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2381127


Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 – A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576


Margherita, E. G., & Braccini, A. M. (2024). Exploring tensions of Industry 4.0 adoption in lean production systems from a dialectical perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(6), 1127–1157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2023-0354 


OECD. (2024). OECD economic surveys: Morocco 2024: Economic assessment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/80777ea7-en 


Rahardjo, B., Wang, F.-K., Yeh, R.-H., & Chen, Y.-P. (2023). Lean manufacturing in Industry 4.0: A smart and sustainable manufacturing system. Machines, 11(1), Article 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11010072 


Saraswat, P., Agrawal, R., & Rane, S. B. (2025). Technological integration of lean manufacturing with Industry 4.0 toward lean automation: Insights from the systematic review and further research directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(6), 1909–1941.https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2023-0316


Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A multi-method approach. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modelling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 197–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_9


Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 785–805.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019


Sony, M., & Naik, S. (2020). Critical factors for the successful implementation of Industry 4.0: A review and future research direction. Production Planning & Control, 31(10), 799–815.https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1691278


Tortorella, G. L., & Fettermann, D. (2018). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2975–2987.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420


Utiyama, M., Alliprandini, D. H., Figuerôa, H. P., Gondim, J. F., Gonçalves, L. T., Navas, L. B., & Zeno, H. (2025). Integration of lean manufacturing and factory physics in an Industry 4.0 roadmap for augmenting operational performance. The TQM Journal, 37(2), 544–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2023-0210 


Vader, T., Maidanovych, V., Chyzh, L., Khoteyeva, N., & Kravtsov, O. (2025). Quantifying the digital dividend: The causal effect of human resources digitisation on labour productivity in Ukrainian firms. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 20(4), 731–741.https://doi.org/10.57017/jaes.v20.4(90).06


Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster. 


Wiese, S. A., Lehmann, J., & Beckmann, M. (2024). Organisational culture and the usage of Industry 4.0 technologies: Evidence from Swiss businesses [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.12752