image

Balancing Leadership Styles for Sustainable Public Sector Efficiency

Download Paper PDF: Download pdf
Author(s):
Abstract:

The study analyses the influence of various leadership styles - autocratic, transactional, transformational, and laissez-faire - on the efficiency and sustainability of public institutions. By applying the Spearman correlation coefficient, the research identified significant interrelationships among these leadership styles. The results showed that transactional and transformational styles are closely correlated, suggesting a synergy in promoting efficiency while uphold human rights principles. In contrast, the autocratic style is negatively correlated with the other styles, underscoring its limitations in fostering participatory and adaptive governance. Interestingly, laissez-faire leadership is positively linked to both transformational and transactional styles, emphasising the importance of autonomy in cultivating innovative and resilient organisational environments. The findings highlight that achieving a balance between diverse leadership approaches is essential for driving sustainable development within the public sector. This research provides actionable insights for public sector leaders, emphasising the role of adaptability, integrity, and collaborative leadership in advancing organisational performance and fostering sustainable institutional growth.


© The Author(s) 2024. Published by RITHA Publishing under the CC-BY 4.0. license, allowing unrestricted distribution in any medium, provided the original work, author attribution, title, journal citation, and DOI are properly cited.


How to cite:

Riza, I. & Bogdan, A. M. (2024). Balancing Leadership Styles for Sustainable Public Sector Efficiency. Journal of Global Sustainability and Development, Volume I, Issue 1, 81 – 93. https://doi.org/10.57017/jgsd.v1.i1.05


References:

Achor, S. (2010). The happiness advantage: The seven principles of positive psychology that fuel success and performance at work. New York: Broadway Books. ISBN-10: 0307591549, ISBN-13: 978-0307591548


Araya-Orellana, J. P. (2022). Assessment of the leadership styles in public organizations: An analysis of public employees’ perception. Public Organization Review, 22(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00522-8 


Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership. Theory, research and managerial applications. New York: Free Press. ISBN: 978-0743215527


Brooks, I. (2006). Organisational Behaviour: Individuals, Groups and Organisation. London: Pearson Education. ISBN: 978-0273706214


Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research strategies. Business research methods. Oxford: University of Oxford. ISBN: 978-0199668649


Burke, B. F. (2010). Adaptive leadership as a facilitator of public engagement on environmental sustainability issues. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02134.x


Chahuara, A. (2014). Leadership, human relations and organisational climate in teachers of educational institutions of metropolitan Lima District. Perú: UNDAC


Dumdum, U. R., Lowe, K. B., & Avolio B. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415219065


Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569


Ghanizadeh, A., Noori, R., Hassanpoor, A., Vakili, Y. (2023). Considering and validating the leadership as a driver in public sector organizations performance management. Public Organization Review, 23(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00601-4


Hannah, S., & Gardner, W. (2005). Veritable authentic leadership: emergence, functioning and impact.  Oxford: Elsevier. ISBN: 978-0762310918


Hill, N., & Alexander, J. (2000). Handbook of customer satisfaction and loyalty measurement. London: Gower Publishing. ISBN: 978-0566083821


Horton, S., & Farnham, D. (2007). Turning leadership into performance management. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlang. ISBN: 978-3835006763


House, R. J. & Javidan, M. (2004). Overview of GLOBE. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761924008


Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.891


Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755


Keller, S. (2019). What Are Primary Sources? London: Britannica Educational Publishing. ISBN: 978-1508103173


Kissinger, H. (2022). Leadership: Six Studies in World Strategy. New York: Wiley- Blackwell. ISBN: 978-0593489444


Rehman, S., Sami, A., Haroon, A., & Irfan, A. (2019). Impact of sustainable leadership practices on public sector organizations: A systematic review of past decade. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, 2(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v2i3.927


Safdar, A., & Khan, R. (2023). Impact of responsible leadership on sustainable performance: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05012-3


Udin, Z. (2024). Leadership styles and sustainable performance. Management Research, 12(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024171


Vyttas, V., & Xanthopoulou, P.I. (2024). Types of leadership and their impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of public organizations: A literature review. Corporate Governance: Research and Advanced Practices, 28–31. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgrapp4