image

Geoeconomic Shifts, Trade Wars, and Global Sustainability: A Dynamic CGE Analysis of US-China-EU Impacts

Download Paper: Download pdf
Download supplementary file: Download
Author(s):
  • Yassine EL HAJOUI Laboratory of Economic Analysis and Modelling (LEAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
  • Adil EZ-ZETOUNI Laboratory of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco
  • Nabil El BAOUCHARI FSJES-Souissi, Laboratory of Economic Analysis and Modelling (LEAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
Abstract:

Everyone eagerly awaits November 4, 2024, when the European Commission is expected to definitively increase tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles if negotiations with China yield no results. This decision is more closely related to the U.S. elections than any other reason. Indeed, the rise of Kamala Harris and the continuation of Biden's anti-China policies may push the European Union to take this measure, which could trigger a trade war between the Western bloc, led by the United States, and the Eastern bloc, led by China. On the other hand, if Trump returns to the White House, his protectionist policies, which do not distinguish between enemies and allies, could drive the European Union closer to China (Belt and Road Initiative), leaving the United States almost alone against the Eastern bloc strengthened by the European Union's adhesion. This article aims to analyse these two scenarios to understand their respective impacts on the economies in conflict by using a dynamic multi-regional computable general equilibrium model based on the PEP w-t celebrated with the GTAP 11 database and the updated CEPII 2022 scenario.

The simulation results of the first scenario reveal an almost absolute superiority of the Eastern bloc, particularly in the automotive sector (the declared cause of the conflict). Indeed, this sector in China experienced a growth of +19.99% compared to the baseline scenario. At the same time, the West, particularly the European Union, saw a contraction in this industry of -15.56% compared to the base scenario. Regarding the implicit objective of this conflict, namely 'slowing down China's economic rise', the results indicate that it fails, as the Chinese economy is expected to surpass that of the United States by 2030.


© The Author(s) 2025. Published by RITHA Publishing under the CC-BY 4.0. license, allowing unrestricted distribution in any medium, provided the original work, author attribution, title, journal citation, and DOI are properly cited.


How to cite:

EL Hajoui, Y., Ez-zetouni, A., & El Baouchari, N. (2025). Geoeconomic Shifts, Trade Wars, and Global Sustainability: A Dynamic CGE Analysis of US-China-EU Impacts. Journal of Global Sustainability and Development, Volume II, Issue 2, 43 – 64. https://doi.org/10.57017/jgsd.v2.i2.03 

References:

Aguiar, A., Chepeliev, M., Corong, E., & Mensbrugghe, D. van der. (2022). The Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Data Base: Version 11. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.070201AF

Australian Strategic Policy Institute. (2023). China’s global leadership in critical technologies. https://www.aspi.org.au

Bekkers, E., & Schroeter, S. (2020). An economic analysis of the US-China trade conflict. WTO Staff Working Papers, Article ERSD-2020-04. https://ideas.repec.org//p/zbw/wtowps/ersd202004.html 

Bergsten, C. F. (2018). China and the United States: The contest for global economic leadership. China & World Economy, 26(5), 12-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12255

Bown, C. P., & Irwin, D. A. (2019). Trump’s Assault on the Global Trading System: And Why Decoupling from China Will Change Everything. Foreign Affairs, 98(5), 125-137. https://www.piie.com/commentary/op-eds/trumps-assault-global-trading-system-and-why-decoupling-china-will-change 

Bui, Q., & Irwin, N. (2018, July 12). How much will the trade war cost a typical American family? Around $60 (so far). The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com

Chong, T. T. L., & Li, X. (2019). Understanding the China - US trade war: Causes, economic impact, and the worst-case scenario. Economic and Political Studies, 7(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2019.1658032

European Commission. (2024). Press release: EU imposes provisional tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. https://ec.europa.eu

Freund, C., Ferrantino, M., Maliszewska, M., & Ruta, M. (2018). Impacts on global trade and income of current trade disputes. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/ 685941532023153019/pdf/Impacts-on-Global-Trade-and-Income-of-Current-Trade-Disputes.pdf 

Freund, C., & Ornelas, E. (2010). Regional Trade Agreements. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124455

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2020). World economic outlook: Growth slowdown, precarious recovery. https://www.imf.org

Legrain, P. (2018, April 13). Why China will win the trade war. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com

Liu, K. (2018). Chinese manufacturing in the shadow of the China - US trade war. Economic Affairs, 38(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12305

Li, C., He, C., & Lin, C. (2018). Economic Impacts of the Possible China–US Trade War. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1540496X. 2018.1446131 

Li, M., Balistreri, E. J., & Zhang, W. (2020). The US - China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Asian Economics, 69, 101216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101216 

Li, Y., Chen, B., Li, C., Li, Z., & Chen, G. (2020). Energy perspective of Sino - US trade imbalance in global supply chains. Energy Economics, 92, 104959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104959

Navarro, P. (1984). The policy game: How special interests and ideologues are stealing America. John Wiley & Sons Inc; First Edition, 356 pages, ISBN-10: ‎1861977085, ISBN-13: 978-1861977083

Ortiz Valverde, G., & Latorre, M. C. (2020). A computable general equilibrium analysis of Brexit: Barriers to trade and immigration restrictions. The World Economy, 43(3), 705-728. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12881 

Ossa, R. (2011). Trade Wars and Trade Talks with Data. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1918676 

Robinson, S., & Thierfelder, K. (Eds.). (2018). US Withdrawal from International Trade: Analysing the Impact on the Global Trading System with a Global CGE Model and a Gravity Model. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332969/?v=pdf 

Tsutsumi, M. (Ed.). (2019). The Economic Consequences of the 2018 US-China Trade Conflict: A CGE Simulation Analysis.

US Census Bureau. (2019, 2021). Trade in goods with China. https://www.census.gov 

Vinogradov, A. O., Salitsky, A. I., & Semenova, N. K. (2019). US-China economic confrontation: Ideology, chronology, meaning. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-35-46

World Trade Organization (WTO). (2020). World trade statistical review. https://www.wto.org 

Robichaud, V., Lemelin, A., Decaluwé, B., & Maisonnave. H. (2014). PEP-w-t –The PEP standard multi-region, recursive dynamic world CGE model:  Update, with a reference scenario. Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP) Research Network, Université Laval, Québec. https://www.pep-net.org/research-resources/cge-models