image

About Governance of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System. The Case of Bulgaria. Part III

Download Paper PDF: Download pdf
Author(s):
Abstract:

This paper is the third part of our attempt to examine the governance, efficiency, and development of the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) in Bulgaria based on a project related to mechanisms and the modes of agrarian governance in Bulgaria. The research continues with the expert assessment on governance of AKIS in Bulgaria and the SWOT analysis regarding development strategy and intervention needs providing recommendations and actionable steps to address the identified weaknesses and enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and inclusiveness of the AKIS governance. 

It is emphasising the approaches of comparative data and institutional analysis, gap analysis, SWOT, strategic orientation, experts’ assessments to identify actors and relations, state and trends in development, assess strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, formulate adequate strategy, and specify overall and public intervention needs of AKIS in the country.


© 2023 The Author(s). Published by RITHA Publishing. This article is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which permits any further distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


How to cite:

Bachev, H. (2023). About Governance of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System. The Case of Bulgaria. Part III, Journal of Research, Innovation and Technologies, Volume II, 1(3), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.57017/jorit.v2.1(3).07 


References:

[1] EIP-AGRI EU SCAR (2012). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition – A reflection paper, Brussels.

[2] European Commission (2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, European Commission, Brussels, 1.6.2018

[3] FAO (2019). Communication in Research and Development. http://www.fao.org/3/v9406e/ v9406e02.htm 

[4] USDA (2019). Agricultural Research Funding in the Public and Private Sectors, USDA. https://www.ers.usda. gov/data-products/agricultural-research-funding-in-the-public-and-private-sectors/

[5] World Bank (2006). Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington DC.

[6] https://www.mzh.government.bg/media/filer_public/2020/01/21/analiz_na_sstoianieto_na_selskoto_stopanstvo_i_khranitelno-vkusovata_promishlenost_izgotven_ot_institut_po_agrarna_ikonomika.pdf