Generative Artificial Intelligence and Green Choices: Exploring Environmental Attitudes and Digital Behaviour in India
The proliferation of Generative AI (GenAI) tools has introduced new dynamics in user behaviour, environmental perception, and digital sustainability. This study, based on a primary questionnaire survey of 1,005 GenAI users aged 18 and above from India, investigates the frequency of GenAI usage and its relationship with climate change awareness, environmental concern, and willingness to adopt energy-efficient digital practices. Using regression-based models, the research reveals a pattern of indirect dependence: lower GenAI usage is related with a greater inclination toward environmentally responsible behaviours, such as transitioning from non-sustainable platforms and adopting energy-efficient digital services. In contrast, frequent GenAI users tend to perceive climate change as temporally distant and of lower immediate importance.
The study also examines how the frequency and nature of social media usage influence users’ attitudes toward sustainable technology choices. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, AI educators, digital strategists, and sustainability advocates aiming to foster environmentally conscious technology adoption in emerging economies like India.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by RITHA Publishing. This article is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which permits any further distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited maintaining attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and URL DOI.
Chittineni, J., Maheswari, P., Sahila, C., & Balakrishnan, S. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and green choices: exploring environmental attitudes and digital behaviour in India. Journal of Research, Innovation and Technologies, Volume IV, 2(8), 143-172. https://doi.org/10.57017/jorit.v4.2(8).03
Alkaf, A. R., Priatna, D. K., Yusliza, M. Y., Farooq, K., Khan, A., & Rastogi, M. (2023). Green intellectual capital and sustainability: The moderating role of top management support. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 25 - 42. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2023.28.1.02
Almiron, N., Moreno, J. A., & Farrell, J. (2023). Climate change contrarian think tanks in Europe: A network analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 32(3), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221137815
Alzoubi, Y. I., & Mishra, A. (2024). Green artificial intelligence initiatives: Potentials and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 468, Article 143090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143090
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Abdalla, S., Mogaji, E., Elbanna, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). The impending disruption of creative industries by generative AI: Opportunities, challenges, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 79, Article 102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102759
Brocklehurst, F. (2021). International Review of energy efficiency in data centers. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/ sites/default/files/documents/international-review-energy-efficiency-data-centres.pdf
Chatterjee, D. (2024). An empire of artificial intelligence: Exploring an intersection of politics, society, and creativity. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-024-09484-3
Chauhan, D., Bahad, P., & Jain, J.K. (2024). Sustainable AI: Environmental implications, challenges, and opportunities. Explainable AI (XAI) for Sustainable Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003457176-1
Chen, J., Shang, H., Li, P., & Liu, J. (2024b). Green credit and carbon emission reduction technology R&D for competitiveness. Journal of Competitiveness, 16(4), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2024.04.12
Coan, T. G., Boussalis, C., Cook, J., & Nanko, M. O. (2021). Computer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 22320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01714-4
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
Dobbe, R., & Whittaker, M. (2019). AI and climate change: How they’re connected, and what we can do about it. https://ainowinstitute.org/publication/ai-and-climate-change-how-theyre-connected-and-what-we-can-do-about-it
Edwards, D., Cooper, Z. G. T., & Hogan, M. (2024). The making of critical data center studies. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231224157
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974
Ermakov, A. (2024). Expert commentary: Electricity demand growth for data centers and AI and implications for natural gas-fired power generation. https://www.gecf.org/_resources/files/events/gecf-expert-commentary-electricity-demand-gro wth-for-data-centres-and-ai-and-implications-for-natur/eefd-ec-2024-electricity-demand-for-data-centres-and-ai.pdf
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599- 023-00834-7
Freitag, C., Berners-Lee, M., Widdicks, K., Knowles, B., Blair, G. S., & Friday, A. (2021). The real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations. Patterns, 2(9), Article 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340
Galaz, V., Centeno, M. A., Callahan, P. W., Causevic, A., Patterson, T., Brass, I., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability. Technology in Society, 67(1), Article 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101741
Hogan, M. (2023). Environmental media” in the cloud: The making of critical data center, art. New Media & Society, 25(2), 384-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221149942
Hosseini, M., Gao, P., & Vivas-Valencia, C. (2024). A social-environmental impact perspective of generative artificial intelligence. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 23, Article 100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100520
Ioku, T., Song, J., & Watamura, E. (2024). Trade-offs in AI assistant choice: Do consumers prioritize transparency and sustainability over AI assistant performance? Big Data & Society, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241290217
Kirkpatrick, A. W., Boyd, A. D., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2024). Who shares about AI? Media exposure, psychological proximity, performance expectancy, and information sharing about artificial intelligence online. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01997-x
Leipold, S., Feindt, P. H., Winkel, G., & Keller, R. (2019). Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1660462
Levický, M., Fiľa, M., Maros, M., & Korenkova, M. (2022). Barriers to the development of the circular economy in small and medium-sized enterprises in Slovakia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(5)
Lewandowsky, S. (2021). Climate change disinformation and how to combat it. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth- 090419-102409
Malkova, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence and sustainable power. The Sustainable Power Grid, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13442-5.00011-9
Moravec, V., Gavurova, B., & Kovac, V. (2025). Environmental footprint of GenAI–Changing technological future or planet climate? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(3), 100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100691
Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
Piccinetti, L., Rezk, M. R., Kapiel, T. Y., Salem, N., Khasawneh, A., Santoro, D., et al. (2023). Circular bioeconomy in Egypt: The current state, challenges, and future directions. Insights into Regional Development, 5(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2023.5.1(7)
Piccolo, L. S., Baranauskas, C., & Azevedo, R. (2017). A socially inspired energy feedback technology: Challenges in a developing scenario. AI & Society, 32, 383–399. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0653-8
Radavicius, T., & Tvaronaviciene, M. (2022). Digitalisation, knowledge management and technology transfer impact on organisations’ circularity capabilities. Insights into Regional Development, 4(3), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2022.4.3(5)
Sarathchandra, D., & Haltinner, K. (2021). How believing climate change is a “hoax” shapes climate skepticism in the United States. Environmental Sociology, 7(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2020.1855884
Sedkaoui, S., & Benaichouba, R. (2024). Generative AI as a transformative force for innovation: A review of opportunities, applications and challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-02-2024-0129
Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21(23), R941–R945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
Wang, P., Zhang, L. Y., Tzachor, A., & Chen, W.-Q. (2024). E-waste challenges of generative artificial intelligence. Nature Computational Science, 4, 818–823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00712-6