From Hyper-Globalization to Global Value Chains Decoupling: Withering Global Trade Governance?
While the 1990s and early 2000s were seen as a golden age for Global Value Chains, the 2010s have witnessed a series of crisis that shacked the political and institutional foundations of global trade. After years of neo-liberal trade policies, trend is now towards neo-realist mercantilism and trade politics.
The COVID-19 pandemics and the rise of geopolitical tensions are redefining and perhaps reversing what have been the drivers of world trade since the end of the Cold War in 1989. Geopolitical and institutional uncertainties increase the chance of unpredictable or unforeseen event disrupting entire international segments of the value chain, with potentially extreme consequences. When fat-tailed black-swans run around like headless chickens, disruptions are unpredictable. Yet, understanding the main changes affecting the geo-politics of trade and the possibilities of safeguarding a functional global trade governance is expected to reduce the risks and help future managers preparing for new business paradigms.
Escaith, H. 2022. From Hyper-Globalization to Global Value Chains Decoupling: Withering Global Trade Governance? Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XVII, Winter, 4(78): 404 – 418. https://doi.org/10.57017/jaes.v17.4(78).11
[1] Almudi, I. and Fatas-Villafranca, F. (2022). Sarewitz-Nelson Rules for innovative choice and technology policy. In Antonelli C. (Ed.) Elgar Encyclopedia on the Economics of Knowledge and Innovation, 431-437. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106996.00072
[2] Baldwin, D. (1993). Introduction to neorealism and neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. Columbia University Press. ISBN: 978-0231084413
[3] Baldwin, R., and. Freeman, R. (2021). Risks and global supply chains: What we know and what we need to know. NBER Working Paper No. 29444. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29444
[4] Beshkar, M., and Lashkaripour, A. (2020). The cost of dissolving the WTO: The role of global value chains. CAEPR Working Paper #2020-005, Indiana University. https://ssrn.com/abstract_id=3600030
[5] Blaesser, B. Y., Serraneau, C. K., and Van den Bossche, P. (2021). Global pandemic roils 2020 Reshoring Index: Shifting focus from reshoring to right-shoring. Kearney USA. https://www.kearney.com/operations-performance-transformation/us-reshoring-index
[6] Coyne, Ch., Hall, A., and Smith, N. (2022). International trade as a peace project. GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 22-40. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4196139
[7] De Backer, K. and Flaig, D. (2017). The future of global value chains business as usual or "A new normal"? OECD Policy Paper No 41. https://doi.org/10.1787/23074957
[8] Escaith, H. (2015). Closing the gaps between trade theories, trade policies and global production statistics: a practitioner's perspective. UN-ECE Conference of European Statisticians. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2629090
[9] Escaith, H. (2021). Withering globalization? The global value chain effects of trade decoupling. MPRA Paper No. 107935. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3853645
[10] Evenett, S. (2022). Protectionism and unilateralism: running the subsidy race. Europe and Global Governance Centre at ISPI, Milano. https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/running-subsidy-race-36540
[11] Enderwick, P. (2011). Understanding the rise of global protectionism. Thunderbird International Business Review, 53(3): 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20410
[12] Erixon, F., Guinea, O., Lamprecht, Ph., Sharma, V., and Zilli, R. (2022). The new wave of defensive trade policy measures in the European Union: Design, structure, and trade effects. ECIPE Occasional Papers, 04/2022, Brussels. https://ecipe.org/publications/new-wave-of-defensive-trade-policy-measures-in-eu/
[13] Godet, M., and Durance, Ph. (2011). Strategic Foresight for Corporate and Regional Development. DUNOD - UNESCO - Fondation Prospective et Innovation. ISBN 978-2-10-056338-8
[14] Hillman, J. (2022). China's entry into the WTO: A mistake for the United States? Georgetown University. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4089953
[15] Hoekman, B., Tu, X, and Wolfe, R. (2022). China and WTO Reform. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. 2022_59. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4267102
[16] Koutsoyiannis, D. (2013). Hydrology and change. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(6): 1177-1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.804626
[17] Lamy, P. and Köhler-Suzuki, N. (2022). Deglobalization is not inevitable: how the world trade organization can shore up the global economic order. Foreign affairs snap-shot, 9 June. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ world/2022-06-09/deglobalization-not-inevitable
[18] Loo, M., Subbaraman, R., and Varma, S. (2019). US-China trade diversion: Who benefits? Nomura Global Research Portal. https://www.nomuraconnects.com/focused-thinking-posts/us-china-trade-diversion-who-benefits/
[19] Lundan S., and Van Assche, A. (2021). Reflections on the nexus of complementarity between international business research and the policy practitioner community. Journal of International Business Policy, 4: 201–205, https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-021-00111-y
[20] Mariotti, S. (2022). A warning from the Russian – Ukrainian war: Avoiding a future that rhymes with the past. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 49: 761–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-022-00219-z
[21] Masina, P. (2022). Challenging the belt and road initiative: The American and European alternatives. European University Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/74905
[22] Mavroidis, P., and Sapir, A. (2021). China and the WTO: Why Multilateralism Still Matters. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691206592
[23] Melitz, M.J (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6): 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
[24] Nelson, D. (2021). How do you solve a problem like Maria? US-countervailing measures. EUI Working Paper RSC 2021/33. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/70362
[25] Pollack, M.A. (2022). Trump as a change agent in international law: Ends, means, and legacies. PATHS Conference on Change and Resilience in International Law, Geneva. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4137754
[26] Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Addison-Wesley Series in Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.2307/2987280
[27] Redding, S. (2020). Trade and geography. NBER Working Paper 27821. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27821
[28] Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W., and Wei, Y. (2014). From superstorms to factory fires: Managing unpredictable supply-chain disruptions. Harvard Business Review, January-February. https://hbr.org/archive-toc/BR1401
[29] Slawotsky, J. (2022). The weaponization of human rights in US-China trade policy: impacts and risks. Journal of World Trade, 56(4): 547– 570. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2022022
[30] Todo Y. (2022). Resilient and innovative supply chains: Evidence-based policy and managerial implications. RIETI Discussion Paper 22-P-024, Japan. RePEc:eti:polidp:22024
[31] Van Assche, A. (2018). Steering a policy turn in international business – opportunities and challenges. Journal of International Business Policy, 1: 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0013-0
*** Global Value Chain Development Report (2021). Global Value Chain Development Report 2021: Beyond Production. Asian Development Bank, University of international business and economics, Beijing, World Trade Organization, IDE-Jetro, Japan and the China Development Research Foundation. https://dx.doi.org/10.22617/tCS210400-2
*** UNCTAD (2020). World Investment Report 2020. International production beyond the pandemic. UNCTAD/WIR/2020, Geneva.
*** UNCTAD (2022). The geography of trade and supply chain reconfiguration: Implications for trade, global value chains and maritime transport. TD/B/C.I/54, Geneva.
*** World Bank. (2020). Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Development Report 2020. The World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1457-0
*** WTO (2011). World Trade Report 2011. The WTO and preferential trade agreements, from co-existence to coherence. Geneva. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr11_e.htm